Euthanasia using ethical frameworks

Making good ethical decisions requires a trained sensitivity to ethical issues and a practiced method for exploring the ethical aspects of a decision and weighing the considerations that should impact our choice of a course of action.

Right to Die Should a terminally ill person have the right to ask for death?

Exploring Assisted Suicide; through the ethical frameworks of Act Utilitarianism and Kant’s Ethics

This conforms to our feeling that some good and some bad will necessarily be the result of our action and that the best action will be that which provides the most good or does the least harm, or, to put it another way, produces the greatest balance of good over harm.

We are a more secular society than America, and America found it difficult to imprison Jack Kevorkian who helped over people to die. It helps Euthanasia using ethical frameworks situations involving many people, some of whom may benefit from the action, while others may not.

Government regulations must be followed. The Egoistic Approach One variation of the utilitarian approach is known as ethical egoism, or the ethics of self- interest. Approving of murder when one is convicted of killing another, according to them, creates a universal law of killing--period.

However, the Euthanasia Laws Act effectively discriminates against people living in territories because the Commonwealth does not have the right to legislate on this matter for the States.

Human Rights

It is also easy to give an example of where kindness leads to doing the wrong thing the road to hell is paved with good intentions.

Both law and ethics deal with questions of how we should live together with others, but ethics is sometimes also thought to apply to how individuals act even when others are not involved.

If that is so, then those in agreement should also agree that mercy killing is ethical, too. In Australia, we now have the situation that elderly Australians are travelling overseas in search of voluntary euthanasia, attempting to manufacture drugs in Australia, travelling overseas to buy and import drugs, and taking other initiatives, to give themselves a dignified end of life option if they were to become terminally ill.

Thus if we do not draw the line where it is, we will not be able to prevent substantial harm to others. Despite the more liberal views of Christians, the clergy have been particularly outspoken against voluntary euthanasia. Kant may have said that killing someone to end their pain was using them to another end.

This can easily be demonstrated - sometimes evil actions lead to unintended good consequences. You are asking 'Is death a proportionate outcome? Others reserve morality for the state of virtue while seeing ethics as a code that enables morality.

Life has exceptions, and so must ethical theories. Additionally, detailed records must be kept. Letting a patient die from an incurable disease may be seen as allowing the disease to be the natural cause of death without moral culpability. Natural Law deals in moral absolutes - secondary precepts that cannot be broken regardless of the situation, The end never justifies the means, so no amount of suffering can justify an 'evil act' Do good, avoid evil.

A Framework for Making Ethical Decisions

Situation Ethics is Personal - it puts people Euthanasia using ethical frameworks rules. It is hard to establish any difference in moral character between someone who denies a legitimate request for voluntary euthanasia, and who subsequently watches that person die a slow and painful death, and someone who watches a cancer-ridden pet writhe in agony without putting it down.

However, modern Kantians may well disagree. Ethics provides a set of standards for behavior that helps us decide how we ought to act in a range of situations. Aristotle was concerned with the good for society above the individual.

However, as many terminally ill patients consider that the quality of their life is more important than staying alive, the option of a peaceful death to alleviate their pain and suffering is a more humane and valid alternative.

The current government is engaging in cost-cutting exercises, which is its prerogative, and this places further pressure on the health budget. There are many systems of ethics, and numerous ways to think about right and wrong actions or good and bad character.

Active voluntary euthanasia so long as there are precautions to prevent abuse is supported some other churches. This hypothetical contract is considered fair or just because it provides a procedure for what counts as a fair action, and does not concern itself with the consequences of those actions.

In the spirit of Voltaire, the clergy and other euthanasia opponents most certainly can remonstrate with people requesting euthanasia to change their minds, but they ought not to be able to compel them by insisting on a legislative fiat in a democracy.

Euthanasia There are two types of euthanasia: The rights of an individual must prevail. The inability of State parliaments to stand up to organised religion also denies terminally ill people the right to die with dignity.

However, this framework also has its limitations. Sometimes the easiest way to see if an action is ethically obligatory is to look at what it would mean NOT to perform the action. Three Frameworks Based upon the three-part division of traditional normative ethical theories discussed above, it makes sense to suggest three broad frameworks to guide ethical decision making: The field of ethics is traditionally divided into three areas: For there to be evidence of a slippery slope there would need to be evidence of more non-voluntary deaths within a tolerant, legalised voluntary euthanasia framework.

It seems legislators are starting to respond to the needs of terminally ill patients.Mar 11,  · Ethical Theories on Human Euthanasia/Mercy Killing.

Updated on July 27, Tara Mapes. one must understand euthanasia in two forms, and ethical theories both for, and against, mercy killing. Euthanasia. Voluntary euthanasia, also known as mercy killing, Reviews: 4. Ethics and euthanasia. I recall team-teaching a course in the proper use of laboratory animals.

One week, we taught euthanasia, using animals (rats) that needed to die for a research protocol. cannot be decided by gathering facts or doing experiments — indeed which ethical framework one adopts will in fact determine the shape of.

Ethics resources for students and teachers OCR A level RS Philosophy and Ethics. Ethical theories include Kant, Natural Law, Situation Ethics, Virtue Ethics and Utilitarianism. Ethical issues include Abortion, Euthanasia, Genetic Engineering, War, Infertility Treatment.

Introduction. The topic of euthanasia is one that is shrouded with much ethical debate and ambiguity. Various types of euthanasia are recognised, with active voluntary euthanasia, assisted suicide and physicianassisted suicide eliciting the most controversy.

[1]. MAKING CHOICES: A FRAMEWORK FOR MAKING ETHICAL DECISIONS. Decisions about right and wrong permeate everyday life. Ethics should concern all levels of life: acting properly as individuals, creating responsible organizations and governments, and making our society as a whole more ethical.

When using the frameworks to make ethical. Ethics and euthanasia: natural law philosophy and latent utilitarianism Ian Harriss Abstract This paper considers the ethical complexities of euthanasia, with particular emphasis on natural law theory.

It argues that natural law theory is anti-democratic in the sense that Within this intellectual framework human beings.

Euthanasia using ethical frameworks
Rated 3/5 based on 25 review